Relevance of mercaptans/ thioethers regulations in therapy decisions in endodontics

DOI: 10.3238/dzz-int.2020.0050-0051

Scientific Notification of the German Society of Endodontology and Dental Traumatology



Translation from German: Yasmin Schmidt-Park

Citation: Schäfer E, Appel C: Relevance of mercaptans/thioethers regulations in therapy decisions in endodontics. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z Int 2020; 2: 50–51–0051


Recently in holistic dentistry, more statements are spread that non-vital teeth and root canal treated teeth release mercaptans and thioethers. These products are expected to cause a postulated direct toxic effect as well as pathological immune reactions. In reference to a study by Jacobi-Gresser et al. [2], it is stated that the laboratory results can be impacted significantly by retreatment of a root canal treatment or a tooth extraction. It is therefore suggested that at allegedly increased laboratory values an extraction of a tooth with a non-vital pulp or that has already been root canal treated is indicated.

Mercaptans are aromatic or ali­phatic thioalcohols, give off a very unpleasant odor and result from degradation and the decomposition process of organic material. They naturally act as flavoring substances in milk, cheese, onion, garlic, coffee aroma and nuts. Methanthiole (methyl mercaptan) forms during bacterial protein degradation, amongst others also in human saliva. It is the main cause of halitosis, however, it also exists physiologically in the blood, brain and other human organs. Mercaptans are produced daily during the anaerobic metabolization of intestinal proteins. Increased methyl mercaptan-values in air were found in decompensated liver cirrhosis [6], and in patients with periodontal diseases [5] or gastric ulcers and tumors [4].

Thioethers are sulfur analogues of ethers, mostly insoluble in water and have an extremely unpleasant odor. The dimethyl sulfide results from the decomposition of sulfurous proteins, but is also responsible for the odor and taste of different types of truffles.

Data situation

There is no data on how many mercaptans and thioethers have been released from teeth with a non-vital pulp or that have been root canal treated [1].

Therefore, no statement can be made on if and to what extent teeth with a non-vital pulp contribute to a relevant increase of the physiological concentration of these substances in blood, saliva, air or different organs. It seems highly unlikely that the quantity of theoretically formed substances in a non-vital tooth compared to the physiologically produced quantity have any relevance on daily digestion.

According to a current review on this topic [1] only 2 publications from the dental field are available in PubMed [2, 3]. Therefore methyl mercaptans and thioethers present metabolic products of some bacteria found in root canals during the metaboli­zation of peptides rich in cysteine, glutathione and L-methio­nine [2]. Methyl mercaptans and thioethers are then expected to stimulate inflammatory cytokines (IL-1; IL-6) from within the tooth. In this retrospective investigation [2] two groups were formed: the experimental group (n = 53 patients) with clinic and/or radiological references to an insufficient root canal treatment as well as (n = 20 patients) with clinical symptoms and/or „radiological findings“ as well as the control group (n = 31 patients) with one tooth that had been successfully treated endodontically at least 5 years prior. The authors came to the following results:

  • The patients in the experimental group showed significantly higher stimulated gamma-interferon (IFN-γ) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) values compared to patients of the control group.
  • The tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels were significantly higher in patients of the experimental group compared to the patients in the control group.
  • After endodontic retreatment or extraction, IFN-γ- and IL-10 values have decreased significantly and were not significantly increased any further compared to the control group.


This described investigation [2] is constantly referenced by advocates of mercaptans/thioethers regulations as scientific justification is supposed to verify the test’s specificity. A critical evaluation of the relevant publication allows the following conclusions:

  • A root canal treatment performed successfully obviously does not go along with increased mercaptans/thioethers values. This was definitely confirmed by the control group, which only included patients that had at least one root canal-treated tooth which showed no clinical and radiological findings, and where the root canal treatment was performed 5–24 years prior. Therefore, the statement of the current overview of Hülsmann [1] that „Correctly performed root canal treatments are safe and provide no danger for general health” is strongly confirmed by the results of the work.
  • Endodontic retreatment reduces – to the same extent as a tooth extraction – the IFN-γ- and IL-10-values to the magnitude how it is found in the control group. An indication for extraction can under no circumstances be derived from the present data.
  • The examination can only be used as a limited reference as proof for the tests’ specificity due to the insufficient standardisation of the experimental groups. Relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria that are known to go along with higher mercaptan values were not considered in this investigation. There is no evidence on how much an existing halitosis, the periodontal status or liver and gastric diseases were considered during recruitment of patients and distribution into both groups.


The tests for mercaptans/thioethers regulations currently provided are all nonspecific, because the origin of the detected mercaptans and thioethers cannot be unequivocally verified. If a dental cause is responsible for the allegedly increased mercaptans and thioethers values can be concluded under no circumstances. Therefore, these tests are unfit in the decision-making for teeth with non-vital pulps and root canal treatments and in no way justify a recommendation for extraction.

For the Executive Board of the German Society of Endodontology and Dental Traumatology

Prof. Dr. Edgar Schäfer, Münster Dr. Carsten Appel, Bonn


  1. Hülsmann M: Die Theorie der Fokal­infektion reloaded. Endodontie 2019; 28: 315–327
  2. Jacobi-Gresser E, Schütt S, Huesker K, von Baehr V: Methyl mercaptan and hydrogen sulfide products stimulate proinflammatory cytokines in patients with necrotic pulp tissue and endodontically treated teeth. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2015; 29: 73–84
  3. Lechner J, von Baehr V: Stimulation of proinflammatory cytokines by volatile sulfur compounds in endodontically treated teeth. Int J Gen Dent 2015; 29: 73–84
  4. Suzuki N et al.: Detection of Helio­bacter pylori DNA in the saliva pf patients complaining of halitosis. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57: 1553–1559
  5. Walshe JM: Foetor hepaticus. Lancet 1994; 343: 730
  6. Yaegaki K, Sanada K: Volatile sulfur compounds in mouth air from clinically healthy subjects and patients with periodontal disease. J Periodontol Res 1992; 27: 233–238

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Endodontologie und zahnärztliche Traumatologie e.V. (DGET)

Grafenberger Allee 297

40237 Düsseldorf

Tel.: 0211 41746460

Fax: 021141746469


related files


(State: 11.03.2020)

Latest Issue 2/2020

In Focus

  • Which “band-aid” is appropriate for the dentin wound of permanent teeth?
  • Reconstruction and masticatory rehabilitation of a bilateral maxillary defect
  • Follow-up examination of patients with mini-implants